|
Post by sonofwolfe on Feb 14, 2009 10:15:32 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by Chicawolverina on Feb 14, 2009 12:44:55 GMT -5
NS! heh
That's fawkin so "Blue-Pill"!
It might have been different had it said Michelle Obama presses on at bringing Paul Wolfowitz and other leading neo-con to justice!
But do you think that would ever happen! No! But... NOOOOOOOO!
But, purple just pops with her, and she's still sleeveless in springtime!
>< Tomasina Chicawolverina!
|
|
|
Post by sonofwolfe on Feb 14, 2009 13:03:10 GMT -5
Chica, look at her left hand.
|
|
|
Post by Chicawolverina on Feb 14, 2009 13:49:17 GMT -5
SURE!~ Oh, I keep on forgetting! So, she's a made lieutenant with the THEM? Ok, I just wanna know, I'm not going to be implicated with any of this am I? Oh god... ><Tomasina Chicawolverina!
|
|
|
Post by sonofwolfe on Feb 14, 2009 13:52:23 GMT -5
probably chica but ill watch your back when we are in the camp. just kidding. i wont be offended if you delete this thread.
|
|
|
Post by Chicawolverina on Feb 14, 2009 14:02:56 GMT -5
Ah... well, I'll just let it stand then... as a warning if others that might wish to try that sort of thing, try and try that sort of stuff on TRH. ><Tomasina Chicawolverina!
|
|
|
Post by Roland of Gilead on Feb 15, 2009 14:30:57 GMT -5
I think the index and pinky fingers are supposed to be spread farther apart.
I remember a furor when John Lennon made this sign, but very intentionally. It was around 1970.
|
|
|
Post by Chicawolverina on Feb 15, 2009 15:44:20 GMT -5
Come to think of it, but aren't the middle & ring supposed to be crossed? ><Tomasina Chicawolverina!
|
|
|
Post by Roland of Gilead on Feb 16, 2009 14:38:30 GMT -5
Come to think of it, but aren't the middle & ring supposed to be crossed? ><Tomasina Chicawolverina! Mayhap, but try doing it. It's impossible for me!
|
|
|
Post by sonofwolfe on Feb 16, 2009 17:14:50 GMT -5
the entire pose is meant to indicate ease and casual. there is nothing casual about positioning the fingers in that configuration. She might as well be doing the Vulcan greeting. I found it interesting that when AOL ran this picture, they cut off the lower 10% of the shot which did not display her entire hand. Coincidence?
|
|
|
Post by Chicawolverina on Feb 16, 2009 17:42:14 GMT -5
Ricko, it's possible for me but it looks like legs in the curtsy when I cross them with the ring over the middle. But this is what makes my blood just boil in horrible distgust from C2C! "Tonight's Show, Monday, Feb. 16th: Alternative media activist Alex Jones and author Jerome Corsi will discuss steps some states are taking to preserve sovereignty and personal freedoms which include gun ownership, gold & silver ownership, & home schooling." God, if there's any question remaining as to whether or not Jones isn't a fascist Ruby Ridge KKKlansman spokesmen that settles it pretty fare! ><Tomasina ChicaWolverina!
|
|
|
Post by sonofwolfe on Feb 16, 2009 20:34:16 GMT -5
I dont understand Chica. Are you against gun ownership, gold and silver ownership and home schooling?
|
|
|
Post by Chicawolverina on Feb 16, 2009 21:09:30 GMT -5
Is that one of THEM simple 2D question? Oh... What caliber? ><Tomasina Chicawolverina!
|
|
|
Post by Roland of Gilead on Feb 17, 2009 14:48:56 GMT -5
I heard most of that show. Funny, the one thing Jones ranted against was a supposed proposal that would ban home schooling. Since I am VIOLENTLY opposed to home schooling in most cases, I applauded what Jones feared. But, I don't believe there is any effort underway to grant me my wish.
I would not ban home schooling outright, but if parents want to home-school their kids, they ought to be able to show they have the education and background to do it effectively. There can't be any of this taking textbooks and guidelines and learning as you teach. I had that in Catholic School, because the priests thought it was more important to build strong sports teams. So, I had a Basketball coach teaching biology who knew absolutely nothing and just taught out of the textbook. That's what you normally get with home schooling and it's just another effort to dumb down the country.
Let parents home-school their kids if they can prove they're qualified. Otherwise, make it a felony to keep kids out of schools. This includes the Amish, who thnk it's perfectly OK to yank kids out of school at age 13 so they'll never be smart enough to question their rigid dogma. What are you supposed to do with these religious fundies who think it's OK to teach their kids that the world is 6,000 years old? That's tantamount to child molestation. We punish sexual abuse of children, so why shouldn't we punish intellectual abuse? The damage to the child is the same.
|
|
|
Post by shewolfe on Feb 17, 2009 15:10:15 GMT -5
I agree with most of what you say, Rick. But, I tried home schooling of my son, but they didn't have the modified modules for him so that didn't work. To say that homeschooling your kid is hard, is an understatement. But, there are also drawbacks to having your kid in public school. For one, the viruses that circulate in schools. Schools are a petri dish of millions of bacteria and virii, and you have to get vaccinated against things, because you are so exposed. Then, you have to contrend with the dangers of vaccinations.
I do think it's the obligation of the parent to school their child, whether public or home schooling. Without school, THAT is how you get dumbed down. But, the things they teach you in school do not prepare people for real life - for what lays in store for them, personally and otherwise.
|
|
|
Post by sonofwolfe on Feb 17, 2009 16:37:47 GMT -5
This argument is kinda academic, since American public education is sliding back into the realm of non-education. A survey was done about a generation ago with college sophomores who could not name the country on Americas southern border. It has been true back in the 1970s that if you did not want to end up in a car factory building cars, you had to get a private highschool education in Detroit. Public education in America is laughable. Just another example of denial. America today has very little of what the rest of the world wants, and the only ones still under that false illusion are Americans. pathetic.
|
|
|
Post by Roland of Gilead on Feb 17, 2009 18:21:53 GMT -5
Well, I certainly agree that the schools aren't teaching what they need to teach these days. It's been headed downhill for a long time, but the "No Child Left Behind" was a big nail in the coffin, in that it forces teachers to teach to a standardized test. As for viruses and such in schools...that's one of life's risks. When I was very young, there was the fear of polio and public places were shutting down. The Salk, and later the Sabin vaccine removed the fear. Problem is, we've gone way overboard and overloaded young kids' immune systems.
But recently, I heard on the radio that more and more parents are getting back to what they did when I was very young. Chicken Pox parties are becoming popular again. Here's how it works: When a child in the neighborhood gets the illness, they have a block party. Parents deliberately bring their kids over to play with the sick child, so as to expose themselves, and vaccinate themselves naturally.
Chicken Pox vaccines, if they work, wear off in about 10 years. Natural vaccinations are for life.
It may sound bizarre, but this is the norm when I was very young and it's coming back.
Ideally, parents should work with their kids at home as they learn, but the primary teaching should be left to the professionals.
|
|
|
Post by sonofwolfe on Feb 17, 2009 18:41:13 GMT -5
Willfully exposing a child to chicken pox is abuse.
|
|
|
Post by Chicawolverina on Feb 17, 2009 19:43:25 GMT -5
Wow SOW! God, you're crazy! LOL ~*(G'HugS!)*~ ;D ><Tomasina Chicawolverina!
|
|
|
Post by Roland of Gilead on Feb 17, 2009 21:55:18 GMT -5
Willfully exposing a child to chicken pox is abuse. I would agree, but I remember parents doing it in the early 50's, and the fear of autism from vaccines has them doing it again.
|
|
|
Post by sonofwolfe on Feb 17, 2009 22:08:11 GMT -5
I am not against vaccines. I am opposed to vaccines containing thimerisol. These vaccines ARE available, but the patient must ask for it. I would want to actually see the label on the bottle. Granted, most chicken pox fatalities 80% are adult, but 20% are children. To me that is an unacceptable risk. Ignorance is no excuse. People are basically lazy, intellectually and otherwise.
|
|